The short answer
What does this use case involve?
A product passport connects a product identifier with origin, composition, certifications and lifecycle events. Shared records help organizations exchange evidence, but a reliable scan or ledger entry does not prove the physical item itself is authentic.
Where the current process breaks down
Counterfeits, fragmented suppliers and weak audit trails make product trust hard to prove. Useful for luxury goods, pharmaceuticals, food traceability, batteries, certificates of origin and recall workflows.
From input to outcome
How does the workflow operate?
The following is an illustrative operating model, not a claim about a specific deployment. Ownership, approvals and exception handling should be agreed before implementation.
- 01
Identify the item
Choose product, batch or serialized-item granularity. Link identifiers to ERP records and a physical label that suits the product's lifecycle.
- 02
Collect supplier evidence
Request structured origin and material data with supplier credentials. Record provenance, expiry and verification of certificates.
- 03
Record custody events
Authenticate actors at manufacture, shipment, repair and reuse. Flag missing transitions and implausible events for investigation.
- 04
Expose permitted information
Give customers, regulators and service partners different views. Support corrections and recalls without rewriting historical accountability.
Build the operating stack
Which infrastructure is needed?
These capabilities may sit inside an existing system, a specialist service or an integrated platform. Map each one to a responsible owner; do not assume a single vendor covers every function.
- Digital product passports
- Supplier credentials
- IoT or scan events
- Compliance reporting
Evidence and context
European Commission: Ecodesign for Sustainable ProductsBackground on the product-policy framework. Requirements and implementation timing depend on the product group; blockchain is not the default legal requirement.
Design for the exceptions
What can go wrong?
False data becomes permanent
Verify suppliers and sample physical evidence; preserve correction history.
Identifier copied onto counterfeit goods
Evaluate tamper resistance, duplicate-scan detection and inspection procedures.
Commercial secrets exposed
Separate public product facts from restricted supplier and composition data.
When this is not the right fit
Do not start with a shared ledger if suppliers cannot supply consistent data. Identifier and ERP integration may deliver more immediate value.
A bounded first deployment
How should a team start?
Start with one workflow and named operational owners. A pilot should show that the process works through exceptions, not just that a transaction can succeed once.
- Choose one product family and a manageable supplier group.
- Agree on data fields, access rights and correction ownership.
- Test copied labels, expired certificates and a recall.
- Validate results against physical inventory and existing records.
What should the pilot measure?
- Supplier evidence completeness
- Time to trace a recalled batch
- Unresolved identifier and custody anomalies
Set a baseline and acceptance thresholds before choosing technology. Include support effort and failed cases in the comparison, and validate the result with the teams that will operate it.
Procurement questions
What should you ask vendors?
- How does the identifier stay attached to the physical product?
- Who validates supplier claims?
- Which fields are public and which are commercially restricted?
Request evidence from comparable workflows, a clear responsibility matrix, integration documentation and an export or exit plan. Confirm current capabilities directly rather than relying on a category listing.
Relevant vendor directories
Common questions
Does a product passport require blockchain?
No. Evaluate interoperable identifiers, reliable data and access controls first.
Can provenance records stop counterfeiting?
They can support detection, but copied labels and false source data require physical controls and investigation.
Sources and further reading
Independent implementation guidance, not legal, investment or regulatory advice. Requirements depend on your product, jurisdiction and operating model.
Last updated