Custody and wallet infrastructure

Match with custody and wallet providers for institutional digital assets.

Compare qualified custody, MPC wallets, treasury tools, settlement workflows and investor wallet experiences for RWA and digital asset products.

What custody model is right for a tokenized asset project?

The right custody model depends on asset type, investor profile, regulation, transaction volume and operational control requirements. FluidRWA helps teams compare qualified custody, MPC wallets, embedded wallets, self-custody options and treasury operations providers.

Custody categories

Custody is not one decision. It affects onboarding, transactions, reporting and recovery.

Qualified custody

Regulated custody options for funds, institutions, advisers and security token workflows.

MPC wallets

Policy-controlled signing, approvals, key sharding, treasury management and role-based workflows.

Embedded wallets

User-friendly wallets for non-crypto investors who need simple onboarding and recovery.

Treasury operations

Wallet policies, permissions, reporting, settlements, payments and reconciliation.

Custody integrations

Connections into tokenization platforms, compliance tools, exchanges, payment rails and accounting.

Recovery and controls

Disaster recovery, approval workflows, transaction limits, audit logs and signer governance.

Choose custody with the full stack in mind.

FluidRWA helps you compare wallet and custody options before implementation locks in.

Request custody shortlist